Ukrainian Court Frees Ex-Leader of Georgia From Detention

By The Associated Press Dec. 11, 2017 KIEV, Ukraine — The former president of Georgia who became an opposition leader in Ukraine walked free on Monday after a court in the Ukrainian capital refused to authorize his arrest, and he vowed to push for a peaceful change of government.

The sudden turn of events for the former Georgia president, Mikheil Saakashvili, came three days after his arrest on allegations that he had colluded with Ukrainian businessmen tied to Russia to topple President Petro O. Poroshenko of Ukraine, accusations that Mr. Saakashvili rejected. “I consider myself a prisoner of Ukrainian oligarchs,” he said in what appeared to be a reference to the business background of Mr. Poroshenko, who ran a chocolate business before he was elected. Prosecutors had asked to keep Mr. Saakashvili under house arrest, but the judge turned down the request, prompting applause by Mr. Saakashvili’s supporters. The court’s verdict was a defeat for Mr. Poroshenko, who has faced mounting criticism for his failure to uproot endemic corruption. Mr. Saakashvili said after the verdict that he would coordinate with other political forces in Ukraine to push for a peaceful change of government.

On Sunday, thousands of Mr. Saakashvili’s supporters marched across Kiev, the capital, demanding Mr. Saakashvili’s release and calling for Mr. Poroshenko’s impeachment. Mr. Saakashvili was a key figure in the 2003 protests that drove President Eduard A. Shevardnadze of Georgia from office. He served two terms as Georgia’s president from 2004 to 2013, winning acclaim for his anti-corruption efforts, but drawing criticism over a disastrous war with Russia and what his opponents saw as an authoritarian streak. Mr. Poroshenko named him the governor of the Odessa region of Ukraine in 2015, but he resigned the next year, claiming that Mr. Poroshenko and other officials were impeding anti-corruption reforms, and he became a strong critic of his former patron. Georgia stripped Mr. Saakashvili of his citizenship after his move to Ukraine. Mr. Poroshenko this summer rescinded his Ukrainian citizenship while Mr. Saakashvili was out of the country, leaving him stateless. He forced his way into Ukraine in September, barging across the border from Poland with the help of a crowd of supporters.

https://mobile.nytimes.com/2017/12/11/world/europe/ukraine-saakashvili-poroshenko-georgia-corruption.html?referer=http%3A%2F%2Fm.facebook.com%2F

Comments

THE KREMLIN’S IRREGULAR ARMY: UKRAINIAN SEPARATIST ORDER OF BATTLE

The Kremlin’s political-military campaign in Eastern Ukraine threatens both Kyiv and the rest of Europe three years after Russia’s illegal annexation of Crimea. The Kremlin – in violation of its obligations under the ‘Minsk II’ ceasefire agreements – has fueled the conflict in pursuit of its grand strategic objective to assert dominance over the former Soviet Union. Russian President Vladimir Putin has shown no desire to withdraw his forces despite his failure to develop proxy forces capable of independently extending his campaign of subversion across Ukraine. Putin will continue to extend and exploit the war to destabilize Ukraine and prevent its further integration with the West until faced with costs that change his calculus. This paper demonstrates that Russia’s proxy forces operating in Eastern Ukraine - the Donetsk (DNR) and Luhansk (LNR) Peoples’ Republics - continue to pose a threat to the security of Ukraine and Europe. These proxies only retain the capability to fight th...

Six myths about corruption in Ukraine

When you think about Ukraine, corruption is probably the first word that comes to mind. It’s undermining the country, hollowing out the state, destroying society and preventing reform — or so the media says. Western newspapers are awash in headlines like “Why Ukraine Is Losing the War on Corruption” and “Corruption Is Killing Ukraine’s Economy.” Concern is merited, of course, because corruption remains one of democratic Ukraine’s greatest challenges. But the hyperbolic language, and the implicit — sometimes explicit — claim that Ukraine’s existence and transformation are incompatible with corruption, derives from six myths. Like all myths, these serve as convenient oversimplifications that overshadow the need for genuine understanding. MYTH NO. 1: CORRUPTION IS THE GREATEST THREAT TO UKRAINE’S EXISTENCE. No way. The tens of thousands of Russian soldiers, tanks and artillery sitting along Ukraine’s southern and eastern borders are Ukraine’s sole existential threat. I...

A $250 000 bribe and 40 court hearings

A case against Serhiy Golovatiy in February 2016 became one of the two that were mentioned by the President Petro Poroshenko in his letters to the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine, Prosecutor General’s Office and the Cabinet of Ministers calling to actively engage against corruption. Since April 2016 – the case has been in Podil District Court of Kyiv city. Since then there have been around 40 hearings. On the one hand, compared to other cases – this one shows good dynamics. On the other hand – taking into account how creative the defense is in dragging the process, it will take long to come to an end. In Spring of this year the court finished researching the evidence provided by the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine and the Special Anti-Corruption Prosecutor’s Office. In particular, the court was provided with videos showing how former Head of the Unit of State Expertise of Dual-Use Goods of the Department for State Expertise of the State Service of Exports...

Combating corruption

Search This Blog